Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-05-08 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is better than Moto Z Force, getting a overall score of 86.6 against 75.8. Xiaomi Black Shark 3's body is notably newer, but incredibly heavier and way thicker than Moto Z Force. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has older 10 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better amount of pixels per inch of display. Motorola Moto Z Force features much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a little faster processor than Moto Z Force, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a really longer battery performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a 4720mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a very superior camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has faster video frame rate and a camera with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.