Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-08 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a general score of 86.6, which is much better than Moto Z2 Force Edition's overall score of 77.4. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 body is noticeably newer than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's, but it's a lot thicker and way heavier. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a little faster CPU than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has 4 GB more RAM.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a greater pixel density. Moto Z2 Force Edition has a much better storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has faster video frame rate, a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, a larger aperture for better low-light images and video and a much bigger sensor providing a much better image quality.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a very superior battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 73 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.