Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a general score of 86.6, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A22's 76.1 overall score. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has the previous 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A22 has Android 12. Even though Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is a better phone than the Samsung Galaxy A22, we must highlight that it's also older, somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a sharper screen than Galaxy A22, because it has a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bit larger display and a higher count of pixels per display inch. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has a much better video definition and a back camera with way more mega-pixels. The Galaxy A22 counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a way better battery duration than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.