Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a general score of 94.8, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 3's 86.6 score. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has a more recent 13 version while Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has Android 10 version, so it gives you some additional features. Samsung Galaxy S20's construction is incredibly thinner and way lighter than the Xiaomi Black Shark 3, even when they were only released with a couple months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a better display density.
The Galaxy S20 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy S20 also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has a 4720mAh battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have a 0.59 inches back-facing camera sensor, the same aperture and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a camera with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.