Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-05-08 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver | Black |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with an 86.6 score against 80.1. Although Xiaomi Black Shark 3 and the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro were released with only a few months difference, Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is lighter and a lot thinner. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS, but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has an older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a little better processing power than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better count of pixels per inch of screen.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 captures greater photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video definition, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a little better battery performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 5% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.