Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-05-06 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Mirror Black and Pale Grey | Titan gray |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| $ 499.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is slightly better than the LG K92, getting a score of 88.3 against 85.4. Despite being the best in our current comparison, Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is an a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone than the LG K92. Both phones we compare here work with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has a more recent 11 version while LG K92 has Android 10, so it provides some nice extra features.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has a much better looking display than LG K92. Both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a screen with the same size and the same number of pixels in each display inch. Xiaomi Black Shark 4 features a bit more powerful processor than LG K92, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with a bit better camera than LG K92, although it has a worse 3840x2160 video quality and a lot less megapixels resolution back-facing camera, they both have the same sensor size and the same diafragm aperture. The LG K92 has much more storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG K92 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has just a little better battery life than LG K92, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Although Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is a better device, it costs more than LG K92, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG K92. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Xiaomi Black Shark 4, otherwise you can save some money and buy the LG K92, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.