Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-05-06 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Mirror Black and Pale Grey | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has a global score of 88.3, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo's 81.9 score. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has the previous 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 version. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, it must be told that it is also extremely older, somewhat heavier and thicker.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 features a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Both have the same RAM amount and 8 cores. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a better screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1256 x 2760, a way brighter display and a little bit more pixels per display inch.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 captures a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a way tinier sensor providing a lot worse image quality, a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a lesser mega pixels resolution back facing camera, they both have a F1.8 aperture. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 features a little longer battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 4 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.