Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Oppo |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-05-06 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Mirror Black and Pale Grey | Ocean |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is slightly better than OPPO Find X2 Pro, having a general score of 88.3 against 83.1. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has newer 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10. Although the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is newer than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, it is thicker and just a bit heavier.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because although it has a lot darker display, and they both have a display with the same size, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also counts with a better pixels density and a higher 1440 x 3168 resolution. Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has a little bit better hardware performance than OPPO Find X2 Pro, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro takes slightly better photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, a same resolution back camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a way bigger sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and video.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because it has more internal memory. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has just a little better battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 6 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.