Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-05-06 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Mirror Black and Pale Grey | -- |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Black Shark 4's general score of 88.3. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version while Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has Android 11, giving a couple nice extra features and enhanced performance. Even when the Galaxy A52 5G and Xiaomi Black Shark 4 were released only 2 months apart, the Galaxy A52 5G is a bit lighter and thinner.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also counts with a little larger screen. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a very superior memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also has 2 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a larger back camera sensor and a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
Galaxy A52 5G has a battery duration that's just as good as the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.