Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-05-06 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Mirror Black and Pale Grey | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| $ 499.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has a global score of 88.3, which is a little bit better than Galaxy F62's overall score of 88.1. Although the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 and the Galaxy F62 were released only 2 months apart, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 body is just a little thicker but also just a little lighter. Both devices in this review come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System).
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 features just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy F62, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have a same size screen, the same screen density and an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also has way more brightness.
The Galaxy F62 has a much greater storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy F62 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy F62 counts with a superior battery performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Galaxy F62's camera is very similar to Xiaomi Black Shark 4's camera, because although the Galaxy F62 has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition and the same aperture, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor shooting higher quality photos and videos and a back camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.