Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-05-06 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Mirror Black and Pale Grey | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 4, with a score of 95.4 against 88.3. Both devices we compare here come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version while Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has Android 11 version, providing you a couple additional features. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, but it is also just a little bit heavier.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both have a 8 GB RAM memory and 8 cores. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a little sharper display than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because it has a quite bigger screen, a greater display density, a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a brighter display.
Galaxy S22 Ultra captures much clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a way higher video quality, a back-facing camera with a way better 108 MP resolution and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra and Xiaomi Black Shark 4 both count with incredibly similar storage for apps and games, both of them have the same internal memory capacity. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit superior battery duration than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Black Shark 4. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Xiaomi Black Shark 4, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.