Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-05-06 | -- |
| 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches | -- |
| 7.41 ounces | -- |
| Mirror Black and Pale Grey | -- |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has an overall score of 88.3, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy S25's global score of 82.6. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has the previous 11 version while Galaxy S25 has Android 14. The Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with much more brightness and a just a bit better pixels density.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy S25. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a bit better camera than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a much better 7680x4320 video definition, a camera with more megapixels and a lot larger camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Galaxy S25's memory to store more games and applications is just as good as the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 one, both have exactly the same internal memory. Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.