Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-05-06 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Mirror Black and Pale Grey | Black |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 499.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has a global score of 88.3, which is better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's global score of 80.1. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is a newer cellphone, and it's also somewhat lighter and thinner than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much worse screen density and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a lot bigger display.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 features a way better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low light captures, it also counts with a back camera with a lot better resolution, a lot larger sensor capturing much higher quality photos and a much better (4K) video definition.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a better memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro's battery duration is just as good as the battery life in Xiaomi Black Shark 4.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.