Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-04 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and White | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4650mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is better than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro's score of 78.7. The Apple iPhone X is an noticeably older phone than the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, but Apple was able to make it thinner and lighter anyway. Apple iPhone X has a much more powerful processor than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The iPhone X counts with a better looking screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a little bit better number of pixels per inch of display. Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro features a lot better camera than iPhone X, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor providing a worse image quality, and they both have the same video frame rates, the same diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro also counts with a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
IPhone X's memory for apps and games is just as good as the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro one, both of them have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro counts with a much better battery life than iPhone X, because it has a 71 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.