Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-04 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4650mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has an overall score of 80, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro's 78.7 score. Google Pixel 3 is an incredibly older cellphone than the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, but it is notably lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. The Google Pixel 3 features a much better performing CPU than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a much better screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160, it also counts with a quite higher pixels amount in each inch of screen. Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro also counts with higher video frame rates and a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro counts with a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4650mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.