Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-04 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4650mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro's 78.7 general score. Google Pixel 4's body is thinner and a lot lighter than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, although it was released 3 years before. Google Pixel 4 counts with a much better hardware performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with a sharper display than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels density. The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has a very superior camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors and a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing pictures or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rates and a lot better resolution back facing camera.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro features a way better battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4650mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.