Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-04-04 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and White | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4650mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.48 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, having an 82.9 score against 78.7. Despite of the fact that the Google Pixel 4a is older than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, it's design is somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 4a has older 11 version and Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has Android 12 version.
The Google Pixel 4a has a sharper screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels density. The Google Pixel 4a counts with a much faster processing unit than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller camera sensor capturing worse quality photographs and videos and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro also counts with higher video frame rates and a much more mega-pixels back camera.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro counts with much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro features a really longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 4650mAh battery size against 3140mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.