Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-04-04 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | Clearly white and Just black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4650mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.48 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a general score of 87.5, which is better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro's overall score of 78.7. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is an older device than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, but Google managed to build it somewhat thinner and much lighter anyway. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has the previous 11 version while Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has Android 12 version.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features a very superior processing power than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater pixel density.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro features improved battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4650mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture and a smaller camera sensor taking worse quality photographs and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro also counts with a much more mega pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.