Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 12 | Android 5.0 |
| 2022-04-04 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.65 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4650mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.48 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has a general score of 78.7, which is slightly better than HTC One M9's 77.7 overall score. Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro's construction is extremely newer and just a little bit thinner than HTC One M9's, but it's also notably heavier. Both phones in our current comparison use Android operating system, but Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has newer 12 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version, providing some nice extra features.
HTC One M9 counts with a much greater processing power than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because although it has 5 GB less RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and an extra graphics co-processor. HTC One M9 has a much more vibrant screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because although it has a really smaller display and a little worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a quite greater quantity of pixels in each inch of display.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro counts with a very superior camera than HTC One M9, because although it has a lot smaller back-facing camera sensor, and they both have the same video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro also counts with better video frame rates, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures in low light environments and a much more MP back facing camera.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage. Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro features a superior battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 64 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.