Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 12 | Android 14 |
| 2022-04-04 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.65 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4650mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, having an 87.1 score against 78.7. Both devices we are comparing work with Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the newer 14 version while Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has Android 12 version, giving you some extra features. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design is noticeably newer, a little bit thinner and lighter than the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features an incredibly better looking display than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro. Both of them have a same size screen, an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and the same number of pixels per inch of screen. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a processor that's just as good as Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro's processor, and although the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a larger amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a lot tinier sensor offering a much lower image quality and a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro also counts with a camera with a lot better 108 MP resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with much more storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has just a bit better battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has 4650mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.