Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-04 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4650mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, having a general score of 83.8 against 78.7. Galaxy A50's body is incredibly lighter and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, although it was released many years before. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a really superior hardware performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The Galaxy A50 features a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better pixels density. The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has a greater camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing less light and washed colors and a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy A50 has a slightly bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro features a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 4650mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.