Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-04-04 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and White | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4650mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s is better than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, having an 86.6 score against 78.7. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A50s is way older than the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, it's body is incredibly lighter and thinner. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has the older 10 version while Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has Android 12 version.
The Galaxy A50s has a little sharper display than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better pixel quantity in each display inch. Galaxy A50s features a very superior processor than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro shoots slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a lot tinier camera sensor, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro also counts with a bigger aperture, better video frame rates and a back camera with a lot better 108 mega-pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A50s features a slightly bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A50s, because it has 4650mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.