Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-04-04 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and White | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4650mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is better than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, having a global score of 91.1 against 78.7. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A52s and the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro were released with only a few months difference, the Samsung Galaxy A52s is somewhat thinner and lighter. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A52s has an older 11 version and Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has Android 12.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a lot better performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also counts with a quite better display density.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a way smaller sensor which gives a way lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro also counts with higher video frame rate and a much better resolution back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with more storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro features just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because it has a 4650mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.