Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-04-04 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4650mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is much better than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, with a score of 97.6 against 78.7. Galaxy Fold is an extremely older and way heavier phone than the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, but Samsung was able to build it incredibly thinner anyway. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has Android 12 version.
The Galaxy Fold features a really superior processing power than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory. Galaxy Fold has a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because although it has a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1536 x 2152px.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because it has more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Fold, because it has 4650mAh of battery capacity against 4380mAh.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro features a way better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing photos in poorly lited situations and a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing worse quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro also counts with a way higher resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.