Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-04 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.65 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4650mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a little bit better than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, with a global score of 80.4 against 78.7. Galaxy Note Fan Edition's design is noticeably lighter and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, although it was released many years before. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a very superior performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a sharper display than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a greater amount of pixels per inch of display. The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro features a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light captures and video, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rate and a camera in the back with way more mega pixels.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4650mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.