Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-04-20 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Black Shark's 80.4 general score. Although Apple iPhone X and Xiaomi Black Shark were released only 6 months apart, Apple iPhone X is thinner and just a bit lighter. Apple iPhone X has a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Black Shark, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436, a bit more brightness and a little greater pixels density.
Apple iPhone X has just a little better performance than Xiaomi Black Shark, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and 2 less and slower cpu cores, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. IPhone X takes a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor taking less light and duller colors, and they both have a same size aperture, a back facing camera with a 12 mega pixels resolution and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the iPhone X also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The iPhone X has a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Black Shark has a really longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.