Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-04-20 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark's global score of 80.4. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the previous 14 version and Xiaomi Black Shark has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra body is notably newer and a bit thinner, but just a little heavier than the Xiaomi Black Shark.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a sharper screen than Xiaomi Black Shark, because although it has a little bit worse pixels number per inch of display, it also counts with a way brighter screen, a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bigger display. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has 512 GB internal storage.
The Xiaomi Black Shark has a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has just a little better battery duration than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has a 13% more battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots much better photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a way bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality, a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos, a way more mega pixels camera and better video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.