Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-04-20 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| -- | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G is a little bit better than Xiaomi Black Shark, with an 86.2 score against 80.4. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto G200 5G has older 11 version while Xiaomi Black Shark has Android 9.0 Pie. The Moto G200 5G construction is a lot newer and a bit thinner than Xiaomi Black Shark's, although it is also just a little heavier.
The Xiaomi Black Shark has a little bit better looking screen than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen. The Motorola Moto G200 5G and Xiaomi Black Shark feature very similar memory to install applications and games, they have exactly the same internal storage.
Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Black Shark. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and 8 GB of RAM. The Moto G200 5G has better battery performance than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. Moto G200 5G captures a lot better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.