Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-04-20 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Prism bricks black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has an overall score of 92.9, which is better than the Xiaomi Black Shark's 80.4 score. Galaxy A71 5G UW is a much newer cellphone, and it is also a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter than Xiaomi Black Shark. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has the older 10 version while Xiaomi Black Shark has Android 9.0 Pie.
Xiaomi Black Shark counts with a little better performance than Galaxy A71 5G UW. Both have 8 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processor. The Xiaomi Black Shark has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little better screen density.
Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots greater pictures and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a lot bigger sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality and a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features much more storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a little better battery life than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has a 13% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.