Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-04-20 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is a bit better than Xiaomi Black Shark, getting an 88.1 score against 80.4. Both phones in this review use Android operating system, but Galaxy F62 has the older 11 version while Xiaomi Black Shark has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even though the Galaxy F62 is noticeably newer than the Xiaomi Black Shark, it's heavier and a bit thicker.
The Xiaomi Black Shark features a bit better screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2160 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a brighter display and a just a bit better pixels amount in each inch in the display. Galaxy F62 has a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy F62 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Xiaomi Black Shark counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has more cores and 2 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy F62 has a much better camera than Xiaomi Black Shark, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy F62 also has a lot larger sensor and a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a very superior battery duration than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has a 75 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.