Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-20 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than Xiaomi Black Shark, getting a 98.9 score against 80.4. These devices come with Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an older 13 version and Xiaomi Black Shark has Android 9.0 Pie. Even though Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is just a little heavier than Xiaomi Black Shark, it's thinner and notably newer.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a slightly better display than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has a little bit better display density, a higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution and a larger screen. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Black Shark, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior camera than Xiaomi Black Shark, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking lot better quality photos and videos, a back camera with much more mega pixels and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much greater storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.