Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 13, 12 |
| 2018-04-20 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is much better than the Xiaomi Black Shark's 80.4 overall score. These devices include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has an older 13 version while Xiaomi Black Shark has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy S22 Ultra body is incredibly newer and just a little bit thinner than Xiaomi Black Shark's, but it's somewhat heavier.
The Xiaomi Black Shark counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 8 GB RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a better looking display than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has a better 1440 x 3088px resolution, a little bit larger display, a little bit greater pixels count per display inch and a really brighter screen.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra's memory to install applications and games is just as good as Xiaomi Black Shark's one, both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a very superior camera than Xiaomi Black Shark, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a much more mega pixels back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with longer battery duration than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.