Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-04-20 | -- |
| 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches | -- |
| 6.70 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue and Gray | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 has a global score of 82.6, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark's 80.4 overall score. The Galaxy S25 is a a lot lighter and notably thinner cellphone than Xiaomi Black Shark. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S25 has an older 14 version while Xiaomi Black Shark has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy S25 counts with a sharper display than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has a bit bigger display, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340, a just a little greater pixels density and way more brightness. The Xiaomi Black Shark counts with a much powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and 8 GB of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S25 has as much storage for games and applications as the Xiaomi Black Shark, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy S25's battery duration is very similar to the battery duration in Xiaomi Black Shark. The Samsung Galaxy S25 captures a lot better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a much bigger back camera sensor taking way better quality photos and videos, a much higher resolution camera and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.