Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-04-20 | -- |
| 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches | -- |
| 6.70 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue and Gray | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is better than Xiaomi Black Shark's general score of 80.4. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version while Xiaomi Black Shark has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy S25 Ultra is a a lot thinner and lighter cellphone than Xiaomi Black Shark.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much sharper display than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has a quite bigger screen, a little bit higher count of pixels per inch in the display, much more display brightness and a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much greater memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
The Xiaomi Black Shark has a very superior processor than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better camera than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has a way larger camera sensor, a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photos and video, a much higher 200 mega-pixels resolution camera and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.