Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-04-20 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 402 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark has a score of 80.4, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 score. The Xiaomi Black Shark construction is incredibly lighter and thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Black Shark has 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Xiaomi Black Shark counts with a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Black Shark, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Black Shark shoots way better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light captures and videos and a tinier sensor offering a worse image quality, and they both have a 12 MP camera, the Xiaomi Black Shark also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.