Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-25 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.45 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Aurora Blue, Cosmic Gray and Dream White | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4160mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, with an 88.1 score against 83.6. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy F62 has a more recent 11 version while Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite has Android 10. The Galaxy F62 is a newer device than the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, although it is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker.
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite also counts with a brighter display and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display. Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite features a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite also has more cpu cores (but slower).
Galaxy F62 features a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy F62 features just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same video frame rate and a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy F62 also has a back camera with a way higher 64 megapixels resolution and a larger back camera sensor taking higher quality photographs.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a superior battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, because it has a 7000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.