Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.6 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-25 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.45 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Aurora Blue, Cosmic Gray and Dream White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4160mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is better than Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite's 83.6 global score. Although the Galaxy Fold and Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite were released only 8 months apart, the Galaxy Fold body is somewhat thinner but a lot heavier. Both phones in this comparison include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version while Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy Fold features just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better quantity of pixels per inch of display.
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite has a much better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light images and videos and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Galaxy Fold features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a bit better battery life than Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity against 4160mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.