Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-05-25 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.45 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Aurora Blue, Cosmic Gray and Dream White | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 399 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4160mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite is just a bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with a general score of 83.6 against 80.1. Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite's design is a lot thinner and much lighter than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although they were only released 2 months apart. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite has the previous 10 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher display pixels density.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality pictures and videos and a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 4160mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.