Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.6 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-25 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.45 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Aurora Blue, Cosmic Gray and Dream White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4160mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is much better than the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite's 83.6 general score. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has newer 11 version while Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite has Android 10, so it provides a couple nice extra features and a performance increase. Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite were only released with a few months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is somewhat thinner but also much heavier than the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite.
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite counts with a slightly better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bit better pixel number in each screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing less light and dull colors and worse video frame rates, and they both have a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite also counts with a much more mega pixels camera.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a little better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.