Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2020-04-21 | -- |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 7.34 ounces | -- |
| Alpine white and Solstice grey | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.86 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro has a score of 93.1, which is better than Galaxy A34's global score of 82.9. Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A34, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a just a little worse count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit larger screen.
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A34, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro also has more RAM. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro takes way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A34, because it has a much better 108 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger camera aperture.
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A34, because it has more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A34 has a bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.