Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.1 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-04-21 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Alpine white and Solstice grey | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.86 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, with a overall score of 93.1 against 91.3. Even though the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro is a better phone than the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, it must be noted that it's also older, just a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite lower pixel density, it also counts with a bit bigger display.
Galaxy A52 5G has a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro features just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro also has more RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro captures better videos and photos than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a back camera with much more megapixels, a way bigger sensor taking lot higher quality photos, a bigger camera aperture to capture better images and video in low-light situations and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a battery performance that's just as good as Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro's battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.