Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-21 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Alpine white and Solstice grey | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.86 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro has an overall score of 93.1, which is slightly better than Galaxy F62's 88.1 overall score. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro body is a little thinner and just a little lighter than the Galaxy F62, although it was released just 10 months before. Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro has a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little worse display pixel density, and they both have a screen with the same size, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro also counts with a much brighter screen.
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy F62, because it has more RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores. Galaxy F62 counts with more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy F62, because it has a lot bigger sensor capturing lot higher quality photos and videos, a much higher video quality, a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photos and videos and a lot higher resolution back-facing camera. The Galaxy F62 has a really longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.