Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| 2020-04-21 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Alpine white and Solstice grey | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.86 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro has a global score of 93.1, which is much better than Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 overall score. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro design is newer and thinner than Galaxy S7 Active's, although it's also somewhat heavier. Galaxy S7 Active counts with a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro, because although it has much darker display and a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher count of pixels per inch of display.
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro has a much greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro has a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a greater number of cores (and faster).
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro counts with just a little better battery duration than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro takes a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro also has a lot higher resolution back camera and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.