Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.1 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-04-21 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Alpine white and Solstice grey | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 385 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.86 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro has a global score of 93.1, which is better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's overall score of 80.1. Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro is a lighter and thinner cellphone than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although both of them were released with only 1 months difference. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro features just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a slightly better display than Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro counts with a bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and photographs, a lot higher video resolution and a way better 108 MP resolution camera in the back.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro's battery performance is just as good as Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro's battery duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.