Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-13 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.57 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Atlantic blue, Pearl gray and Rose gold | Silver and Space gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4820mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.64 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a score of 88.1, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite's 81.2 score. IPhone X is an way older phone than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, but it is thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. Apple iPhone X counts with a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The iPhone X features a better looking display than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater pixel amount per inch of screen and a slightly better 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution. Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite has just a bit better camera than iPhone X, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking photographs and video in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor shooting way higher quality photographs and a back facing camera with much more MP.
Apple iPhone X features much more memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite counts with a superior battery performance than iPhone X, because it has a 4820mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.