Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-13 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.57 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Atlantic blue, Pearl gray and Rose gold | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4820mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.64 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR has a score of 82, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite's global score of 81.2. Despite of the fact that Apple iPhone XR is older than the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, it's construction is just a little bit thinner and a bit lighter. Apple iPhone XR features a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, although it has a way lower resolution of 828 x 1792, a just a little inferior pixel amount in each inch of display and a little smaller display.
The iPhone XR's storage capacity to store more games and applications is very similar to Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite's one, both of them have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory. The Apple iPhone XR counts with a superior hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos and a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite features a much longer battery life than iPhone XR, because it has a 4820mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.