Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-13 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.57 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Atlantic blue, Pearl gray and Rose gold | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4820mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite's global score of 81.2. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more recent 14 version while Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite has Android 10, so it gives lots of additional features and a performance increase. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra body is incredibly newer, just a little lighter and a little bit thinner than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much sharper display than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite. Both of them have the same pixels density, the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a display of the same size. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because it has 448 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite has a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because although it has a lower video resolution and a much less mega pixels back camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photography and videos and a lot larger sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality.
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has 4820mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.