Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-13 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.57 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Atlantic blue, Pearl gray and Rose gold | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4820mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, having a score of 83.8 against 81.2. Galaxy A50's body is a lot lighter and thinner than the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, even though it was released just 19 months before. The Galaxy A50 features a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater pixels count per display inch.
The Galaxy A50 features a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite and the Galaxy A50 count with similar CPUs, and although the Galaxy A50 has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a way larger back camera sensor, a lot better (4K) video quality and a much more MP camera. Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite features greater battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has a 4820mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.