Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-13 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.57 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Atlantic blue, Pearl gray and Rose gold | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4820mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.64 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is a lot better than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite's overall score of 81.2. Despite of the fact the Galaxy Fold is older and incredibly heavier than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, it's body is still way thinner. Both devices we compare here include Android operating system, but Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite has Android 10 version, providing you some additional features.
Galaxy Fold counts with a screen that's just as good as Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite's screen, because although the Galaxy Fold has a bit inferior pixel count in each screen inch, it also counts with a little higher 1536 x 2152 resolution and a little bigger display. Galaxy Fold has a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM. Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite features a little longer battery duration than Galaxy Fold, because it has 4820mAh of battery capacity. Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite shoots slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a way tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a lot bigger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.