Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-13 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.57 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Atlantic blue, Pearl gray and Rose gold | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4820mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.64 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, getting an 81.2 score against 80.4. Even though the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite is a lot newer than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, it's somewhat thicker and way heavier. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition's CPU is just as good as the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite one, and although the Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher pixels quantity in each display inch. Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite has a slightly better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite also counts with a camera with way more megapixels and a way bigger back camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photographs and videos.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has an external SD slot that supports up to 256 GB. Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite counts with a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4820mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.